| Re: [railML3] Extensions to the Modelling of Signals [message #3920 is a reply to message #3869] |
Fri, 06 March 2026 09:51  |
christian.rahmig
Messages: 580 Registered: January 2016
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Dear Dominik,
your example is the correct approach to modelling signals belonging to different tracks, but installed at the same pole. Jörg described the concept of signal combinations in an earlier forum post [1] together with a nice visualization. I would probably add the <signalConstruction>@mountedOn="pole" to the container signal in the example.
So, to conclude: railML 3.3 already contains all the information needed to model the given signal combination examples. There is no need for further adaptations w.r.t. railML 3.4.
[1] https://www.railml.org/forum/index.php?t=msg&th=916& goto=3225&#msg_3225
Best regards
Christian
Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
|
|
|
|