Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » [railML3] Extensions to the Modelling of Signals (Two more options related to the physical location of signals)
Re: [railML3] Extensions to the Modelling of Signals [message #3920 is a reply to message #3869] Fri, 06 March 2026 09:51 Go to previous message
christian.rahmig is currently offline  christian.rahmig
Messages: 580
Registered: January 2016
Senior Member
Dear Dominik,

your example is the correct approach to modelling signals belonging to different tracks, but installed at the same pole. Jörg described the concept of signal combinations in an earlier forum post [1] together with a nice visualization. I would probably add the <signalConstruction>@mountedOn="pole" to the container signal in the example.

So, to conclude: railML 3.3 already contains all the information needed to model the given signal combination examples. There is no need for further adaptations w.r.t. railML 3.4.

[1] https://www.railml.org/forum/index.php?t=msg&th=916& goto=3225&#msg_3225

Best regards
Christian


Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [railML3] Modelling serviceSections
Next Topic: [railML3] Additional Switch attributes
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed Sep 09 14:52:35 CEST 2026