Home » railML newsgroups » railml.interlocking » Correspondence IL:trackIL und IS:track (Modeling IL:trackIL)
Re: Correspondence IL:trackIL und IS:track [message #3660 is a reply to message #3512] Mon, 23 June 2025 14:31 Go to previous message
christian.rahmig is currently offline  christian.rahmig
Messages: 530
Registered: January 2016
Senior Member
Dear Stephane,

for trackUS: trackBegin and trackEnd are optional from syntax, but they can become mandatory from use case. Therefore, always look inside the use case element specification table, too, in order to find out if trackBegin and trackEnd have to be provided.

Best regards
Christian

Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Track and switch locks (Befahrbarkeitssperren)
Next Topic: [railML 3.2] Speed dependent overlaps
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Feb 18 13:46:53 CET 2026