| More concise usage of namespaces [message #1691] |
Mon, 15 January 2018 16:23  |
Ferri Leberl
Messages: 24
Registered: September 2016
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Dear All,
The CO:-pseudonamespace is being used inconsistently: On the one hand it is used for the description of elements that don't belong to a subschema. On the other hand, there are several guidelines placed there. At the same time there is a couple of introductory articles with page names starting with Dev:.
By agreement with the railML coordinators I would like to suggest to reserve the Namespaces CO, IS, IL, RS and TT for element descriptions. Articles that do not refer to a single element should in the medium term be moved to the Dev:-space. If a certain Dev:-article refers to a subschema, this connection should be clarified in the text rather than in the title.
The use cases should be moved to a new UC-namespace, essentially switching e.g. IS:UC to UC:IS, as they are too many to push them all into Dev:.
Please, let us know, whether you agree with our proposal or whether you see any drawbacks.
Thank you in advance for your feedback.
Yours,
Mag. Ferri Leberl
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
