Home » railML newsgroups » railml.interlocking » Redundant <hasLevelCrossingType/designator>?
Redundant <hasLevelCrossingType/designator>? [message #3838] Fri, 12 December 2025 13:01 Go to next message
Torben Brand is currently offline  Torben Brand
Messages: 211
Registered: March 2016
Senior Member
Is there a redundancy between:

Infrastructure/functionalInfrastructure/LevelCrossing/typeDe signator [1]

and

Interlocking/specificInfrastructureManager/usesTypes/hasLeve lCrossingType/designator [2]

?

If not, can you please make the differences clearer.

[1] https://wiki3.railml.org/wiki/IS:levelCrossingIS
[2] https://wiki3.railml.org/wiki/IL:hasLevelCrossingType

[Updated on: Fri, 12 December 2025 13:03]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Redundant <hasLevelCrossingType/designator>? [message #3908 is a reply to message #3838] Mon, 23 February 2026 13:58 Go to previous message
Jörg von Lingen is currently offline  Jörg von Lingen
Messages: 123
Registered: March 2016
Senior Member
Dear Torben,

thanks for you pointing this out. As there is no real need to have the designator at this element in IL [2] I removed <designator> from <Leve lCrossingType>.
Best regards,
Jörg von Lingen, Interlocking Coordinator

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic: Clearance indication trigger
Next Topic: Track and switch locks (Befahrbarkeitssperren)
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Tue Jun 16 22:57:05 CEST 2026