Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » [railML3] Natural hazards detection (How to model natural hazard detection in railML 3.2?)
[railML3] Natural hazards detection [message #2638] Mon, 18 January 2021 07:56
christian.rahmig is currently offline  christian.rahmig
Messages: 436
Registered: January 2016
Senior Member
Dear all,

in the railML use case working group "ITMS" the need for modelling natural hazard detection has been discussed. A first solution proposal has been drafted and formulated in Trac ticket #422 [1].

It is proposed to introduce a new functional infrastructure element <detector> with the attributes @detects to describe the type of hazard being detected, and @linkedWith to reference the detector with a <restrictionArea> that defines a certain operational reaction on the detected hazard, e.g. "no stopping".

We would like to collect your feedback in order to finalize the proposal. Here are some specific questions waiting for your answers:

1) Is there a need for a new functional infrastructure element <protectionSystem> to model infrastructure elements along the track protecting against specific hazards, e.g. fences against camels?

2) Shall other infrastructure elements like bridges and tunnels be linked with detectors and protection systems if they are installed?

3) So far, we looked on the natural hazard detection from an infrastructure point of view. How about timetable, rollingstock and other views on that topic?

Any kind of feedback is highly appreciated and helps us bringing railML 3.2 on track...

[1] https://trac.railml.org/ticket/422

Thank you very much and best regards
Christian


Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
Previous Topic: Stop strategies
Next Topic: [railML3] Extension of OPEquipment
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Mar 29 13:31:52 CET 2024