Home » railML newsgroups » railml.misc » More concise usage of namespaces
More concise usage of namespaces [message #1691] Mon, 15 January 2018 16:23 Go to next message
Ferri Leberl is currently offline  Ferri Leberl
Messages: 13
Registered: September 2016
Junior Member
Dear All,
The CO:-pseudonamespace is being used inconsistently: On the one hand it is used for the description of elements that don't belong to a subschema. On the other hand, there are several guidelines placed there. At the same time there is a couple of introductory articles with page names starting with Dev:.
By agreement with the railML coordinators I would like to suggest to reserve the Namespaces CO, IS, IL, RS and TT for element descriptions. Articles that do not refer to a single element should in the medium term be moved to the Dev:-space. If a certain Dev:-article refers to a subschema, this connection should be clarified in the text rather than in the title.
The use cases should be moved to a new UC-namespace, essentially switching e.g. IS:UC to UC:IS, as they are too many to push them all into Dev:.
Please, let us know, whether you agree with our proposal or whether you see any drawbacks.
Thank you in advance for your feedback.
Yours,
Mag. Ferri Leberl
Re: More concise usage of namespaces [message #1699 is a reply to message #1691] Thu, 01 February 2018 18:14 Go to previous message
Ferri Leberl is currently offline  Ferri Leberl
Messages: 13
Registered: September 2016
Junior Member
Dear All,
As the coordinators approved my suggestions, I have made the suggested changes:
The namespaces CO, IL, IS, RS and TT are now reserved for elements.
All overview articles except for the five introdutions to the subschemas have been moved to the Dev:-space.
For use cases, an UC:-space has been opened:
https://wiki.railml.org/index.php?title=UC
The advantage is, that it will be easier to recognize the function of an article. Especially, the articles that should be moved to the railML3 wiki later is now, with five exceptions, limmited to the Dev:-space.
Yours, Leberl
Previous Topic: SI units in railML 3.x
Next Topic: Child elements with one value vs. attributes
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Apr 24 04:53:23 CEST 2018