| Crossings [message #64] |
Wed, 31 March 2004 09:03  |
claus.messauer
Messages: 3
Registered: February 2004
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Hello,
I have a question concerning crossings. In the infrastructure scheme
version 0.93, crossings could be defined with the element junction
(enumeration type: simpleSwitch, simpleCrossing, simpleSwitchCrossing,
double switchCrossing). Where can I define crossings in the scheme 0.94?
I think there is a little mistake in the technical reference. Possible
types of a block are man (in the reference main), auto and LZB.
Best regards
Claus
|
|
|
|
| Re: Crossings [message #65 is a reply to message #64] |
Wed, 31 March 2004 15:52  |
Ulrich Linder
Messages: 28
Registered: July 2003
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Hello,
"Claus Messauer" <clausmessauer(at)alcatelat> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:trOsA5uFEHA.1168@sifa...
> Hello,
>
> I have a question concerning crossings. In the infrastructure scheme
> version 0.93, crossings could be defined with the element junction
> (enumeration type: simpleSwitch, simpleCrossing, simpleSwitchCrossing,
> double switchCrossing). Where can I define crossings in the scheme 0.94?
Crossings will be definded in the next schema release as a kind of
connection.
> I think there is a little mistake in the technical reference. Possible
> types of a block are man (in the reference main), auto and LZB.
I've updated this bug in my internal documents. It will be published within
the next schema release.
With best regards
Ulrich Linder
------------------------------
Dipl.-Ing. Ulrich Linder
Linder Rail Consult
Mörchinger Str. 25
D-14169 Berlin
Tel. +49.30.84 72 56 87
Fax. +49.30.84 47 11 56
Email mailto:UlrichLinder(at)linder-rail-consultde
www http://www.Linder-rail-consult.de
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
