Home » railML newsgroups » railml.common » [Ontology0.6] class naming
[Ontology0.6] class naming [message #3455] Thu, 06 February 2025 13:02 Go to next message
Mathias Vanden Auweele is currently offline  Mathias Vanden Auweele
Messages: 40
Registered: February 2025
Location: Brussels
Member
The ontology contains class names that do not correspond to the class names from RTM/railML. Some examples:
- "NamedRessource" is named "NamedObject" in RTM
- "Level" is named "LevelNetwork" in RTM
- "http://ontology.railml.org/railtopomodel#Relation" is named "NetRelation" in RTM
- "http://ontology.railml.org/railtopomodel#Anchor" is named "LinearAnchorPoint" in RTM

Are these name changes intentional? Shouldn't we try to keep them the same to avoid confusion?

Mathias Vanden Auweele
Railway data freelancer
https://matdata.eu
Brussels, Belgium

Report message to a moderator

Re: [Ontology0.6] class naming [message #3593 is a reply to message #3455] Thu, 24 April 2025 17:07 Go to previous message
Larissa Zhuchyi is currently offline  Larissa Zhuchyi
Messages: 69
Registered: November 2022
Member
Dear all

At the working group meeting 2025-02-26 it was decided that the naming convention of railML ontology should follow the one of RailTopoModel given e.g. at [1] instead of it's implementation as railML.

[1] https://www.railtopomodel.org/download-rtm

Sincerely,

Larissa Zhuchyi – Ontology Researcher
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic: [Ontology v0.6] Widoco documentation not always complete
Next Topic: [Ontology v0.6] Missing properties for LinearCoordinate
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sun Jun 22 04:42:20 CEST 2025