Home » railML newsgroups » railml.timetable » [Proposal]
[Proposal] [message #579] Wed, 05 May 2004 21:12 Go to next message
Nils Poldrack is currently offline  Nils Poldrack
Messages: 14
Registered: April 2004
Junior Member
Hello,

this is only a test for a run of a proposal. Please, do not take it
seriously! But please, take your opportunity to discuss in the forum.
Thank you very much

Nils Poldrack


My proposal:
At a stop of a passenger train in a station there should be references
to connection trains.
Reasons: Information about connection trains can be given immediatly.

(Ich hoffe, mein Englisch ist nicht all zu schlecht. Falls doch, hier
noch mal die deutsche Übersetzung:
Meines Erachtens sollen in das Timetable-Schema bei einem Halt eines
Personenzuges im Bahnhof Referenzen auf mögliche Anschlusszüge eingebaut
werden.
Begründung: Auf diese Weise können unverzüglich Auskünfte über
Anschlusszüge erteilt werden.)

Nils Poldrack
Re: [Proposal] [message #580 is a reply to message #579] Fri, 28 May 2004 10:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
thomas.kauer is currently offline  thomas.kauer
Messages: 15
Registered: January 2004
Junior Member
Hello,

this may be a usefull information. As far as I know there is no algorithm
that really works in all cases to get the connections needed.
One could also add an attribute to define the kind of connection:
- passenger
- staff
- engines
- ...
But for me this can be added in a later version of the schema if there is
a need for it.

Best regards



Nils Poldrack wrote:

> Hello,

> this is only a test for a run of a proposal. Please, do not take it
> seriously! But please, take your opportunity to discuss in the forum.
> Thank you very much

> Nils Poldrack


> My proposal:
> At a stop of a passenger train in a station there should be references
> to connection trains.
> Reasons: Information about connection trains can be given immediatly.

> (Ich hoffe, mein Englisch ist nicht all zu schlecht. Falls doch, hier
> noch mal die deutsche Übersetzung:
> Meines Erachtens sollen in das Timetable-Schema bei einem Halt eines
> Personenzuges im Bahnhof Referenzen auf mögliche Anschlusszüge eingebaut
> werden.
> Begründung: Auf diese Weise können unverzüglich Auskünfte über
> Anschlusszüge erteilt werden.)

> Nils Poldrack
Re: [Proposal] [message #581 is a reply to message #579] Wed, 02 June 2004 16:59 Go to previous message
Joachim.Rubröder is currently offline  Joachim.Rubröder
Messages: 33
Registered: September 2004
Member
Hello,

to add connection trains into the timetable seems to be usefull.
An easy way would be to use the existing connection-Element with some
new enumerations for the connOperation-attribute like
"isWaitingFor"/"isExpectedBy" ... the other train mentioned in the
attribute "connection/trainID".

A more complicated way including waiting reasons like "staff", "engine",
"passengers" should be added in a later version, if there is a special
need for it.

Any proposals about this way of integration and/or the names of the
attributes?


Best regards,

Joachim Rubröder



Nils Poldrack schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> this is only a test for a run of a proposal. Please, do not take it
> seriously! But please, take your opportunity to discuss in the forum.
> Thank you very much
>
> Nils Poldrack
>
>
> My proposal:
> At a stop of a passenger train in a station there should be references
> to connection trains.
> Reasons: Information about connection trains can be given immediatly.
>
> (Ich hoffe, mein Englisch ist nicht all zu schlecht. Falls doch, hier
> noch mal die deutsche Übersetzung:
> Meines Erachtens sollen in das Timetable-Schema bei einem Halt eines
> Personenzuges im Bahnhof Referenzen auf mögliche Anschlusszüge eingebaut
> werden.
> Begründung: Auf diese Weise können unverzüglich Auskünfte über
> Anschlusszüge erteilt werden.)
>
> Nils Poldrack
>
>
>
Previous Topic: Timetable updates
Next Topic: timetable scheme 1.00 !!
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Mar 29 14:12:09 CET 2024