Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » [railML3] Type of a name of an operational point (Adding a new attribute in railML3 specifying whether the name is operational, traffic or local)
[railML3] Type of a name of an operational point [message #3211] Wed, 13 March 2024 13:56 Go to next message
Larissa Zhuchyi is currently offline  Larissa Zhuchyi
Messages: 38
Registered: November 2022
Member
Dear all

<operationalPoint> [1] in railML3 has child <name> with @description, @name and @language attributes [2]. railML.org would be grateful if you could communicate your thoughts on the following points:
(1) should railML 3.3 be extended by @type of enumerated datatype of <name> for <operationalPoint> element?
(2) do you see any other ways (implicit) to categorize type of the name of <operationalPoint> in railML3?

As an example in railML2 there is this attribute of the name of <ocp> called @type with extendable enumeration "operationalName, trafficName, localName" [3]. This classification of names of operational points seems to be videly used in the real world.

Currently, when transforming railML2 data to railML3 @type (operationalName, trafficName) of railML2 has to be either discarded or mapped to the @description of railML3.

@description of <name> of <operationalPoint> of railML3 in this context:
- seems to be rather generic;
- something human-readable comparing to the enumerated datatype.

[1] https://wiki3.railml.org/wiki/IS:operationalPoint
[2] https://wiki3.railml.org/wiki/Generic:name
[3] https://wiki2.railml.org/index.php?title=IS:ocp&stable=0

Sincerely,


Larissa Zhuchyi – Ontology Researcher
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org

[Updated on: Wed, 13 March 2024 13:57]

Report message to a moderator

Re: [railML3] Type of a name of an operational point [message #3260 is a reply to message #3211] Fri, 21 June 2024 13:53 Go to previous message
christian.rahmig is currently offline  christian.rahmig
Messages: 447
Registered: January 2016
Senior Member
Dear railML community,

since there has been no reaction and feedback on this topic and questions so far, I assume that there is no need for a typification of an operational point name. If this assumption is wrong, please let us know by answering here in the forum, so that we can incorporate the topic in the development of upcoming railML 3.3.

Thank you very much and best regards
Christian


Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
Previous Topic: [railML3] Restricting aggregation of RailTopoModel
Next Topic: [railML3] Units of Gradients
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Jul 15 10:21:24 CEST 2024