Home » RailTopoModel newsgroup » RailTopoModel » Harmonize rolenames for association between *Location and *AssociatedNetElement
Harmonize rolenames for association between *Location and *AssociatedNetElement [message #1862] Tue, 03 July 2018 08:00 Go to next message
Felix Prüter is currently offline  Felix Prüter
Messages: 22
Registered: June 2016
Location: Berlin
Junior Member
Dear RTM-Community,
by studying the "new" RTMv1.1 UML Location package I recognized a mismatch in rolenames.
The rolename of OrderedAssociatedNetElement(s) for a LinearLocation is associatedElements
The rolenname of AssociatedNetElement(s) for an AreaLocation is associatedNetElements

Do you agree that this should be harmonizes for "code styling reasons"?

Kind regards


--
Felix Prüter
SIGNON Deutschland GmbH
Re: Harmonize rolenames for association between *Location and *AssociatedNetElement [message #1874 is a reply to message #1862] Thu, 12 July 2018 16:08 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Airy Magnien is currently offline  Airy Magnien
Messages: 5
Registered: September 2016
Junior Member
In principle yes (if I may paraphrase Radio Yerevan).
In practice, there may be an even more compelling reason for harmonizing, as the class Location::OrderedAssociatedNetElement is very likely to disappear from the next minor version (RTM 1.2), in favour of an ordered relation with AssociatedNetElement. This change should be confirmed shortly.
Re: Harmonize rolenames for association between *Location and *AssociatedNetElement [message #1877 is a reply to message #1874] Thu, 12 July 2018 20:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Felix Prüter is currently offline  Felix Prüter
Messages: 22
Registered: June 2016
Location: Berlin
Junior Member
Ok.
I will wait for that.


--
Felix Prüter
SIGNON Deutschland GmbH
Re: Harmonize rolenames for association between *Location and *AssociatedNetElement [message #1890 is a reply to message #1862] Mon, 06 August 2018 15:59 Go to previous message
christian.rahmig is currently offline  christian.rahmig
Messages: 140
Registered: January 2016
Senior Member
Dear Felix,

from railML side I agree with you in having both rolenames synchronized
as "associatedNetElements".

Best regards
Christian

--
Christian Rahmig - Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Phone Coordinator: +49 173 2714509; railML.org: +49 351 47582911
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railml.org


Am 03.07.2018 um 08:00 schrieb Felix Prüter:
> Dear RTM-Community,
> by studying the "new" RTMv1.1 UML Location package I
> recognized a mismatch in rolenames.
> The rolename of OrderedAssociatedNetElement(s) for a
> LinearLocation is associatedElements
> The rolenname of AssociatedNetElement(s) for an AreaLocation
> is associatedNetElements
>
> Do you agree that this should be harmonizes for "code
> styling reasons"?
>
> Kind regards
Previous Topic: Network location
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Aug 16 08:00:26 CEST 2018