Forum: RailTopoModel » Wording remarks to IRS30100

Home » RailTopoModel newsgroup » RailTopoModel » Wording remarks to IRS30100 (Collective thread to all verbalisation or wordings in the IRS30100 (Version April 19th, 2016))

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Wording remarks to IRS30100 [message #1373]

Thu, 23 June 2016 13:54

Felix Prüter
Messages: 28
Registered: June 2016
Location: Berlin

Junior Member

Hello,
we (SIGNON Deutschland GmbH) are validating the use of RailTopoModel as the base model for several railway-related applications dealing with various proprietary infrastructure input data. For that reason, I studied the IRS 30100. Now I have several questions and remarks for which I will open seperate topics.

The first remark is just a wording topic: (p.14, 2nd. par.)
Quote:

...since resources are identified HERE as...

It's not clear and hard to find out what HERE references to.
For me it references the TRADITIONAL REPRESENTATION, right?

Regards
Felix Prüter
SIGNON Deutschland GmbH

[Updated on: Thu, 23 June 2016 21:36] by Moderator

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Wording remarks to IRS30100 By: Felix Prüter on Thu, 23 June 2016 13:54
		IRS 30100 wording remarks By: Felix Prüter on Thu, 23 June 2016 14:10
		Re: IRS 30100 wording remarks By: christian.rahmig on Fri, 19 August 2016 16:14
		Re: Wording remarks to IRS30100 By: Vasco Paul Kolmorgen on Thu, 23 June 2016 21:28
		Re: Wordng remark to irs 30100 By: christian.rahmig on Mon, 27 June 2016 11:12
		Re: Wordng remark to irs 30100 By: Airy Magnien on Wed, 07 September 2016 15:50

Previous Topic:	Attribute applicationDirection of LinearLocation
Next Topic:	Redundant attribute description table

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Apr 19 01:31:49 CEST 2024