| planned passenger capacities [message #948] |
Wed, 16 October 2013 13:49  |
Andreas Tanner
Messages: 52
Registered: March 2012
|
Member |
|
|
Dear all,
we want to transmit the planned passenger capacity of a train section as
opposed to the formation that the train is "implemented with" in a
subsequent planning step. The natural place to put this property would
be the trainpartSequence of the commercial train. The train parts
(referenced both by the commercial and operational train) then have the
formation with the number of seats etc.
In a more general sense, most properties of <formation> are possibly
needed here. Also, they may vary across operating periods. So we are
more or less in the position to need a reference to a trainPart - but
not a <trainPartRef> since it's not one among the other train parts with
their positions.
So I suggest to add a child <commercialTrainPartRef> for this purpose.
On the long run (railML3), it should be possible to model commercial and
operational views on a train with different trainParts and having a
"implements" relationship from the operational to the commercial view.
What do you think about this?
Best, Andreas.
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
