Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » More detailed 'speed change' definitions
Re: Mandatory stops e.g. before a level crossing [message #1587 is a reply to message #1541] Thu, 18 May 2017 18:56 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Dirk Bräuer is currently offline  Dirk Bräuer
Messages: 311
Registered: August 2008
Senior Member
Dear Christian,

why do you think that there is no final solution? Possibly all other
thought there is:

- Mandatory stops shall be regarded as infrastructure at least if there
is a sign at the place of the stop. (In every case I know, there is one.)

- Mandatory stops can be modelled with a <speedChange> with speed=0. We
already do so. Where is the problem?

- German "Betriebsbremsung" is not infrastructure, it's <rules> or such.
It can be closed here (as you wrote in your other post).

With best regards,
Dirk.
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re-factoring of <infraAttributes>
Next Topic: Hierarchy of overlaying speed profiles and National vs. Generic speed profiles.
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Mar 28 10:31:01 CET 2024