| power attribute in vehicle/engine/propulsion [message #1225] |
Fri, 10 January 2014 14:19  |
Susanne Wunsch railML
Messages: 0
Registered: January 2020
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
The 'power' attribute inside the 'vehicle/engine/propulsion' element is
required by the XML schema.
How about a very rough definition, where only electric versus diesel
propulsion may be specified? A power="0" seems to be very misleading for
this case. But it fulfills the XSD-requirements and validates fine. :-(
I would opt for an optional "power" attribute for the next major release.
Kind regards...
Susanne
--
Susanne Wunsch
Schema Coordinator: railML.common
|
|
|
|
| Re: power attribute in vehicle/engine/propulsion [message #1226 is a reply to message #1225] |
Sat, 29 March 2014 06:32  |
Joerg von Lingen
Messages: 148
Registered: May 2011
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On 10.01.2014 14:19, Susanne Wunsch wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The 'power' attribute inside the 'vehicle/engine/propulsion' element is
> required by the XML schema.
>
> How about a very rough definition, where only electric versus diesel
> propulsion may be specified? A power="0" seems to be very misleading for
> this case. But it fulfills the XSD-requirements and validates fine. :-(
>
> I would opt for an optional "power" attribute for the next major release.
>
> Kind regards...
> Susanne
>
Hi Susanne,
it is correct that "power" may be "0". However, it is the number of propulsion
power in Watt. The type of propulsion power is in attribute "powerType", which
is an enumeration. In addition I would keep both as mandatory. Once you have
defined any kind of propulsion system one shall know its type and its (rough)
capacity.
Thus I would not change it.
--
Best regards,
Joerg v. Lingen
Rollingstock Coordinator
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
