Home » railML newsgroups » railml.misc » tVersionNumber
tVersionNumber [message #1074] Thu, 20 March 2008 20:39 Go to next message
Joachim Rubröder is currently offline  Joachim Rubröder
Messages: 88
Registered: April 2007
Member
Hi Susanne,
a new Version "1.1.1" would be fine, but tVersionNumber is defined as
decimal (x.yy). Shall we switch to string with pattern xx.yy.zz ?

Kind regards,
Joachim Rubröder
Re: tVersionNumber [message #1075 is a reply to message #1074] Mon, 09 June 2008 11:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Susanne Wunsch is currently offline  Susanne Wunsch
Messages: 180
Registered: March 2008
Senior Member
coord(at)timetablerailMLorg wrote:
> Hi Susanne,
> a new Version "1.1.1" would be fine, but tVersionNumber is defined as
> decimal (x.yy). Shall we switch to string with pattern xx.yy.zz ?
>
> Kind regards,
> Joachim Rubröder

Maybe or not.

We should distinguish between "release version" and "developer version".

If some release version needs correction, some three part version number
should be helpful. (Your offer: xx.yy.zz)

In October, 2007 we released railML 1.1. That means all schemas got
release version number 1.1.

So next release version should also cover all sub-schemas:
* in case of corrections with next minor version 1.1.1,
* in case of minor changes with 1.2
* in case of restructuring with 2.0

Changes in "rollingstock"-schema shows need for 1.1.1

If nobody disagrees, I would help with new type for "tVersionNumber" in
"genericRailML.xsd".

For developer version we should find another way, tagging it!

I would prefer some version control tool like CVS or Subversion.

In order to operate until this question is solved, we can use simple
counting appending to file name (e. g. "timetable_1.1-R1.xsd") and
uploading to "genesis site".

Feel free to comment.

Kind regards,
Susanne

--
Susanne Wunsch
Schema Coordinator: railML.common
Re: tVersionNumber [message #1076 is a reply to message #1075] Thu, 12 June 2008 11:04 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Susanne Wunsch is currently offline  Susanne Wunsch
Messages: 180
Registered: March 2008
Senior Member
Susanne Wunsch wrote:
> coord(at)timetablerailMLorg wrote:
>
>> a new Version "1.1.1" would be fine, but tVersionNumber is defined as
>> decimal (x.yy). Shall we switch to string with pattern xx.yy.zz ?
>
> If some release version needs correction, some three part version number
> should be helpful. (Your offer: xx.yy.zz)
>
> Changes in "rollingstock"-schema shows need for 1.1.1
>
> If nobody disagrees, I would help with new type for "tVersionNumber" in
> "genericRailML.xsd".
>

My offer would be following:

<xsd:simpleType name="tVersionNumber">
<xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
<xsd:pattern value="[1-9][0-9]?\.([0-9]|[1-9][0-9])(\.[1-9][0-9]?)?"/>
</xsd:restriction>
</xsd:simpleType>

That allows version numbers like:

first part: 1.0 10.0 99.0
second part: 1.0 1.9 1.10 1.99
third part: 1.0.1 10.0.10 1.0.99

It doesn't match following strings:

0 no comment
1 use 1.0 instead
1.00 use 1.0 instead
1.0.0 use 1.0 instead
1.01 use 1.1 instead
1.0.01 use 1.0.1 instead

I hope, it might be understood. Anything else, I can help with less
theoretical examples.

Feel free to discuss.

Do we really need it???

If nobody disagrees, I upload the code in "common-genesis".
(http://www.railml.org/en/development/common_genesis.html)

Kind regards,
Susanne

--
Susanne Wunsch
Schema Coordinator: railML.common
Re: tVersionNumber [message #1077 is a reply to message #1076] Wed, 02 July 2008 22:06 Go to previous message
Susanne Wunsch is currently offline  Susanne Wunsch
Messages: 180
Registered: March 2008
Senior Member
Susanne Wunsch wrote:
> Susanne Wunsch wrote:
>
>> coord(at)timetablerailMLorg wrote:
>>
>>> a new Version "1.1.1" would be fine, but tVersionNumber is defined as
>>> decimal (x.yy). Shall we switch to string with pattern xx.yy.zz ?

> If nobody disagrees, I upload the code in "common-genesis".
> (http://www.railml.org/en/development/common_genesis.html)

Done. (Nobody sent a follow up.)

State of file "genericRailML.xsd" is beta for next release version.

Download (developer page):
<http://www.railml.org/en/development/common_genesis.html>

Kind regards ...
Susanne

--
Susanne Wunsch
Schema Coordinator: railML.common
Previous Topic: Missing basic type "tFrequencyHertz"
Next Topic: Proposal RailML(R) - Protocol
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Mar 24 22:44:57 CET 2017