Home » railML newsgroups » railml.timetable » request for "remarks"
request for "remarks" [message #827] Wed, 17 October 2012 20:47 Go to next message
Dirk Bräuer is currently offline  Dirk Bräuer
Messages: 311
Registered: August 2008
Senior Member
Dear Joachim and all others,

in <timetable>...<trainPart> we have an attribute "remarks". We do use
this attribute so far.

There is no such attribute at <timetable>...<train>. There is a
"description" at <train> but from my side, "remarks" and "description" are
by far not the same. So we do not want to use the "description" for the
"remarks" of a train. (And, by the way, we also have "description" at
<trainPart>.)

Are there any objections against adding an attribute "remarks" at <train>
in 2.2? If not: Would you please add such an attribute?

Thank you!

Best regards,
Dirk.

Report message to a moderator

Re: request for "remarks" [message #836 is a reply to message #827] Wed, 31 October 2012 19:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Joachim Rubröder railML is currently offline  Joachim Rubröder railML
Messages: 0
Registered: November 2019
Hello Dirk,

thanks for your "remarks" - no objections.

http://trac.assembla.com/railML/ticket/177

Kind Regards,
Joachim

--
----== posted via PHP Headliner ==----

Report message to a moderator

Re: request for "remarks" [message #839 is a reply to message #836] Mon, 05 November 2012 20:03 Go to previous message
Joachim Rubröder railML is currently offline  Joachim Rubröder railML
Messages: 0
Registered: November 2019
Hi everyone,

The 2.2-ticket #177 has been implemented and the requested attribute will
be available in the next revision 469.

Kind regards,

Joachim


--
----== posted via PHP Headliner ==----

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic: missing bitMask at <trainPart><operatingPeriodRef>
Next Topic: Some small changes, wishes and recommendations for RailML2 timetable schemes
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Tue Apr 16 11:47:06 CEST 2024