Forum - RDF feed
https://www.railml.org/forum/index.php
Ordered LinearAnchorPoints?
https://www.railml.org/forum/index.php?t=rview&goto=1377&th=457#msg_1377
when LinearAnchorPoint instances form an ordered set of named points, then the association between LinearPositioningSystem and LinearAnchorPoint should be tagged as ordered.
Like the association between OrderedElementCollection and NetElement.
Kind regards
Felix
SIGNON Deutschland GmbH]]>Felix Prüter2016-06-23T12:49:36-00:00Re: Ordered LinearAnchorPoints?
https://www.railml.org/forum/index.php?t=rview&goto=1402&th=457#msg_1402
In the case of "LinearAnchorPoints" the sequence of the instances is
defined by the attribute "measure".
The attribute "measure" has to be strictly increasing.
Are you aware of usecases where this assumption is not valid?
Best regards
Christian
Am 23.06.2016 um 18:18 schrieb Felix Prüter:
> Hello,
> when LinearAnchorPoint instances form an ordered set of
> named points, then the association between
> LinearPositioningSystem and LinearAnchorPoint should be
> tagged as ordered.
> Like the association between OrderedElementCollection and
> NetElement.
>
> Kind regards
> Felix
> SIGNON Deutschland GmbH
--
Christian Rahmig
railML.infrastructure coordinator]]>christian.rahmig2016-08-19T14:28:52-00:00Re: Ordered LinearAnchorPoints?
https://www.railml.org/forum/index.php?t=rview&goto=1407&th=457#msg_1407
how to handle the case of a mileage jump where we jump back with the mileage?
We'd need 2 AnchorPoints (at the same location) and the anchestor has a higher milege then the descendant.
Best regards
Felix]]>Felix Prüter2016-09-01T12:15:54-00:00Re: Ordered LinearAnchorPoints?
https://www.railml.org/forum/index.php?t=rview&goto=1423&th=457#msg_1423
thank you for your contribution to challege and improve RTM.
On behalf of Gilles Dessagne:
Yes, you are right. In this case you should cut the LinearPositionningSystem into two parts.
Best regards
Alain Jeanmaire/ Gilles Dessagne
SNCF Réseau]]>Alain Jeanmaire2016-10-07T08:46:13-00:00